Ruby originally had adapters for each database. The problem was that each was very database specific. This was a problem due to both SQL differences, as well as API differences.
no behavior
1997 - ruby-postgres was first created.
2000 - DBI
2004 - Active Record
Although AR made things easier, it had strong opinions. These opinions did not always map perfectly to any particular database.
2007 - Sequel
Completely DB independent API.
Example is concatanating strings, which requires a completely different syntax in each flavor of SQL database.
Concise
Optional Behavior
Opinions?
Ruby should be like clay in a child's hands - Matz
Sequel advantages:
- Simple - as possible but no simpler
- Flexible - opinions, not dogma
- Powerful
- Lightweight - 1/2 memory usage as active record
- Well maintained
- Easy to Contribute
- Easy to Understand
- More Fun
Show me the *** code!
require 'seq'
DB = Sequal.sqlite('larun')
DB[:attendees].count
# => 1
DB[:attendees].first
# => {:name ='', :address =>}
Transactions
DB.trans do
DB[:entry],insert(:account_id => 1)
...
end
SQL Loggers
DB.loggers << Logger.new($stdout)
Each DB has its own connection pool
DB[:table].all # or .each
.update(:column => 'value)
.delete
DB[:table] # this is a dataset... like query cursor
Sequel is a functional API, where object methods return copies of themselves.
.select - while columns
.filter
.order
This means you can easily chain function calls, like jQuery. Awesome!
Sequel represents its internal objects using SQL's own internal representations
Sequel has 'core' and 'model'
class Attendee < Sequel::Model
many_to_one
one_to_many
end
Hooks & Validations - got 'em
Sequel it built entirely out of plugins. That sounds interesting, but experience with DataMapper has shown me that too many plugins may not be a good thing. However, I do not have any direct experience with Sequel yet, so this may be a non-issue.
13 - # of database adapters that Sequel supports today
Database graphing
Everything was going so well up to this point. However, Jeremy then tried to do his demo on Windows, just to show that if you are one of the poor souls using Windows, it can still work for you. He failed to account for the quirkiness of conference display adapters, and what that can do to a machine. Oh well, no demo.
That said, I was really impressed by what I heard about Sequel. I think I will have to try it out on something, just to see how it does.
No comments:
Post a Comment